Skip to main content

Results Overview

Overview results from SKUP evaluations

SKUP strives for key information from our evaluations to be easily accessible. The overview tables below consist of limited, but important, information from our evaluations. For more information, see full report or summary from the evaluation of interest. The SKUP evaluations are in constant development, therefore it may be difficult to compare older reports with more recent reports.

The tables below consist of overview results from the 10 latest SKUP evaluations of SMBG systems, distributed in two tables. The evaluations assessed against the current and updated APSs are listed in the first table and earlier evaluations, assessed against older APSs, are listed in the second table. In Sweden, glucose meters should fulfil stricter quality goals when used in selected patient groups a. See full reports on whether results are within the stricter APS.

Evaluated against updated APS

SMBG system

Manufacturer

SKUP evaluation

Measurements performed by

Fulfilling APS for imprecision1

Fulfilling APS for accuracy2

User-friendliness

Actiste

Brighter AB

2021/120

BLSs

No

No

Unsatisfactory

People with diabetes

No

No

Accu-Chek Instant

Roche Diagnostics

2017/113

BLSs

Yes

Yes

Satisfactory

People with diabetes

No

Yes

Accu-Chek Guide

Roche Diagnostics

2017/112

BLSs

Yes

Yes

Satisfactory

People with diabetes

Yes

Yes

Accu-Chek Aviva

Roche Diagnostics

2014/105

BLSs

Yes

Yes

Satisfactory

People with diabetes

Inconclusive

Yes

mylife Unio

Bionime Corporation

2013/100

BLSs

Yes

Yes

Satisfactory

People with diabetes

Yes

Yes

1APS for imprecision is CV ≤5 %.
2Minimum requirement: 95 % of the results within ±0,83 mmol/L of the average measured values of the reference measurement procedure at glucose concentrations <5,55 mmol/L or within ±15 % at glucose concentrations ≥5,55 mmol/L.

 


ahttps://www.equalis.se/media/b2cj1rmk/pr008_eng_swedish-national-quality-goals-for-measurement-of-glucose_2018-12-10.pdf

Evaluated against previous APS

SMBG system

Manufacturer

SKUP evaluation

Measurements performed by

Fulfilling APS for imprecision1

Fulfilling APS for accuracy2

User-friendliness

Accu-Chek Mobile

Roche Diagnostics

2013/99**

BLSs

Yes

Yes

Evaluated in SKUP/2009/74

Mendor Discreet

Mendor Oy

2012/95

BLSs

Yes

Yes

Inconclusive

People with diabetes

Inconclusive

Yes

Contour XT

Bayer Healthcare

2012/94

BLSs

Yes

Yes

Satisfactory

People with diabetes

Yes

Yes

Accu-Chek Performa

Roche Diagnostics

2011/933

BLSs

Yes

Yes

Satisfactory

OneTouch Verio

LifeScan, Johnson & Johnson

2011/86

BLSs

Yes

Yes

Inconclusive

People with diabetes

Yes

Yes

1APS for imprecision is a CV ≤5 %.
2Minimum requirement: 95 % of the results within ±0,83 mmol/L of the average measured values of the reference measurement procedure at glucose concentrations <5,55 mmol/L or within ±15 % at glucose concentrations ≥5,55 mmol/L.
3The evaluation was performed only by BLSs.

The results in the reports are presented in mmol/mol, with analytical performance specifications being calculated using IFCC%. Do note that the results are not directly comparable between all evaluations as the APSs have been updated over the years.

 

HbA1c system

Manufacturer

SKUP evaluation

Measurements performed by

Fulfilling APS for imprecision2

Fulfilling APS for accuracy

User-friendliness

cobas b 101 HbA1c

Roche Diagnostics

2022/1291

Personnel in PHCC

Yes

No3

Inconclusive

Afinion 2 Analyzer HbA1c

Abbott Diagnostics Technologies

2021/126

BLSs

Yes

Yes3

Satisfactory

Personnel in PHCC

Yes

Yes3

cobas b 101 HbA1c

Roche Diagnostics

2020/117

BLSs

Inconclusive

No4

Satisfactory

Personnel in PHCC

Yes

No4

InnovaStar analyzer

DiaSys Diagnostic Systems

2014/101

BLSs

Yes

No5 

Satisfactory

Personnel in PHCC

Inconclusive

No5

Quo-Test A1c

Quotient Diagnostics Ltd

2012/91

BLSs

Inconclusive

Yes5

Satisfactory

Personnel in PHCC

Inconclusive

Yes5

1Performed only by intended users, i.e., personnel in PHCCs.
2APS; Precision, calculated as repeatability, ≤3,0 CV%, except for Quo-Test A1c where it was ≤4,0 CV%.
3Minimum requirement: 95 % of the results within ±3,0 mmol/mol from the results of the comparison method at HbA1c concentration <35,3 mmol/mol and within ±8,5 % at HbA1c concentration ≥35,3 mmol/mol.
4 Minimum requirement: 95 % of the results within ±8,5 % from the results of the comparison method.
5 Minimum requirement: 95 % of the results within ±10 % from the results of the comparison method.

Ag-RDT

Manufacturer

SKUP evaluation

Sample material

Fulfilling recommendation for sensitivity

Fulfilling recommendation for specificity

User-friendliness

MF-68 SARS CoV-2 Antigen Test

Shenzhen Microprofit Biotech Co. Ltd.

2022/131

Nasal

No

Yes

Satisfactory

Flowflex SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Rapid Test

Acon Biotech Hangzhou Co. Ltd.

2022/128

Nasal

No

Yes

Satisfactory

NADAL Covid-19 Ag Test

Naal von Minden GmbH

2022/125

Nasal

No

Yes

Satisfactory

Clinitest Rapid Covid-19 Antigen Test

Healgen Scientific Limited Liability company

2021/127

Naso-pharyngeal

No

Yes

Satisfactory

 

LumiraDx

 

LumiraDx UK Ltd.

2021/124

Naso-pharyngeal

Yes

Yes

Satisfactory

Nasal

Yes

Yes

 

RDT

Manufacturer

SKUP evaluation

Fulfilling performance requirement for sensitivity

Fulfilling performance requirement for specificity

 

User-friendliness

DIAQUICK Strep A Blue Dipstick

DIALAB GmbH

2018/114

No

Yes

Satisfactory

QuickVue Dipstick Strep A Test

Quidel Corporation

2015/107

Yes

No

Satisfactory

SKUP have performed nine evaluations at hospital laboratories only, using another evaluation protocol. Those rapid tests were not evaluated by the intended users, and no real patient samples were involved. Due to this, these evaluations are not presented on this page. 

Abbreviations

Ag Antigen
APS Analytical performance specification
BLS Biomedical laboratory scientist
CV Coefficient of variation
PHCC Primary health care center
RDT Rapid detection test
SMBG Self-monitoring of blood glucose
Strep A Streptococcus pyogenes group A

We use technologies, including cookies, to collect information about you for statistical purposes.
By clicking ‘Accept’, you give your consent for all these purposes.